Comparing and contrasting Bandura’s cognitive theory Essay

Introduction Perhaps there are as many differences as there are similarities between the ideas uttered in Banduras Cognitive hypothesis and Becks Cognitive Theory. Many similarities exist between the two theories because they are both based on the discover of human behavior and personality. However, the ideas expressed and mechanisms used in analysis confer some discord between the two theories. It is evident that no two persons in the humankind would have exclusively similar thoughts about a phenomenon hence, differences are always abound.Since studies in similar fields are usually related in a way, prevalence of similarities should not occur as a surprise. For example, the fact that behavior is affected by, among other things, the environment, is embraced in the detail of both theories. The two theorists are also of common opinion that negative thoughts are likely to trigger negative behavior and dysfunction in many activities. For example, Banduras system highlights that pop ulate with high opinions about themselves are usually better performers in many activities than those who weigh themselves on a lower scale.In the same way, Becks theory is emphatic of the point that negative thoughts in people lead such people to have low opinion of themselves and evaluate themselves negatively. Banduras Cognitive Theory and Becks Cognitive Theory both view the environment as a determinant of personality and behavior. While Bandura (1976) used environmental factors in his triad, Beck (1976) showed that the world (in reference to the environment) is one of the factors that shape a persons behavior, attitudes and perceptions about various phenomena.Both theorists agree that the environment acts together with other factors to shape a persons character and behavior. For instance, Bandura (1986) observed that aggressive behavior in adolescents is caused by the environment, but the behavior as well creates an environment. Bandura referred to such a kindred as reciprocal determinism. On the other hand, Beck (1976) noted that the world shapes a persons character since a person acts in accordance with what is happening in the ecumenic world.Disparities in Banduras and Becks theories are evident right from the beginning of the model. While there is a similarity of the use of a triad, the constituents of the triads are the obtain of dissonance. This is in addition to many other instances in the illustration of the applications of the two models. This paper gives an analysis of the similarities and differences in the two theories and the implications or causes of such scenario. Moreover, the paper go away highlight the key areas where similarities as well as differences occur between the two theories.